Line Drawings vs. Curvature Shading:Scientific Illustration of Range Scanned Artefacts

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHörr, Christianen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrunnett, Guidoen_US
dc.contributor.authorVix, Christianen_US
dc.contributor.editorPauline Jepp and Oliver Deussenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-22T07:18:25Z
dc.date.available2013-10-22T07:18:25Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.description.abstractFor scientific archaeological illustrations, pen-and-ink drawings are traditionally the most prevalent type. Over the years, drawing styles have substantially changed several times and even today there is basically no general agreement about how to illustrate objects best. Without doubt, this is one major reason why most computergenerated line drawings are still recognized as such, although non-photorealistic rendering has made significant advances during the past decade. With a special focus on cultural heritage objects and the theoretical and practical restrictions of current NPR techniques on scanned range data, we discuss the question if line drawings could generally be replaced by a detail-shaded view, which highlights relevant features, but still conveys an objective plastic impression as well.en_US
dc.description.seriesinformationComputational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization, and Imagingen_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-905674-24-8en_US
dc.identifier.issn1816-0859en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2312/COMPAESTH/COMPAESTH10/041-049en_US
dc.publisherThe Eurographics Associationen_US
dc.subjectCategories and Subject Descriptors (according to ACM CCS): I.3.3 [Computer Graphics]: Picture/Image Generation- Line and curve generation; J.2 [Physical Sciences and Engineering]: Archaeology-en_US
dc.titleLine Drawings vs. Curvature Shading:Scientific Illustration of Range Scanned Artefactsen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
041-049.pdf
Size:
4.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
CompAesth 10: Workshop on Computational Aesthetics