Readability and Precision in Pictorial Bar Charts

dc.contributor.authorSkau, Drewen_US
dc.contributor.authorKosara, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.editorBarbora Kozlikova and Tobias Schreck and Thomas Wischgollen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-12T05:20:03Z
dc.date.available2017-06-12T05:20:03Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractBar charts embellished with unique artistic styles, or made to look like real objects, are common in information graphics. Embellishments are typically considered detrimental to readability and accuracy, since they add clutter and noise. Previous work has found that some of the shapes used, like rounded tops, triangles, etc., decreased accuracy when judging relative and absolute sizes, while T-shaped bars even showed a slight increase relative to the basic bar chart. In this paper, we report on a study that adds pictorial elements to bar charts of four different shapes tested previously, thus also including the elements of color and texture. We find that pictorial bar charts reduce accuracy, but not beyond the effect already observed for their shape. They also do not significantly increase response time. Embellished bar charts may not be as problematic as commonly assumed.en_US
dc.description.sectionheadersVisual Design, Case Studies, and Evaluation
dc.description.seriesinformationEuroVis 2017 - Short Papers
dc.identifier.doi10.2312/eurovisshort.20171139
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-03868-043-7
dc.identifier.pages91-95
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2312/eurovisshort.20171139
dc.identifier.urihttps://diglib.eg.org:443/handle/10.2312/eurovisshort20171139
dc.publisherThe Eurographics Associationen_US
dc.titleReadability and Precision in Pictorial Bar Chartsen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
091-095.pdf
Size:
1.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Collections